Primary navigation
Codex

Codex use case

Prioritize drug targets

Rank drug targets across multiple evidence lanes.

Difficulty Advanced
Time horizon Long-running

Use Codex with the Life Science Research plugin to normalize entities, retrieve genetics, cohort, clinical, literature, and expression evidence in parallel, score each lane, and produce a final ranking with reusable visuals.

Best for

  • Target prioritization questions that need more than one evidence family, such as genetics, cohort replication, disease context, clinical precedent, literature, and expression.
  • Teams that want Codex to perform scientific research across multiple evidence lanes, then reconcile the results into one conclusion.
  • Scientists who want saved raw payloads, an explicit scoring rubric, and visuals they can reuse in the next review or decision memo.

Contents

    ← All use cases

    Prioritize drug targets

    Rank drug targets across multiple evidence lanes.

    Use Codex with the Life Science Research plugin to normalize entities, retrieve genetics, cohort, clinical, literature, and expression evidence in parallel, score each lane, and produce a final ranking with reusable visuals.

    Advanced
    Long-running

    Use Codex with the Life Science Research plugin to normalize entities, retrieve genetics, cohort, clinical, literature, and expression evidence in parallel, score each lane, and produce a final ranking with reusable visuals.

    Advanced
    Long-running

    Best for

    • Target prioritization questions that need more than one evidence family, such as genetics, cohort replication, disease context, clinical precedent, literature, and expression.
    • Teams that want Codex to perform scientific research across multiple evidence lanes, then reconcile the results into one conclusion.
    • Scientists who want saved raw payloads, an explicit scoring rubric, and visuals they can reuse in the next review or decision memo.

    Skills & Plugins

    • Search scientific databases and literature to ground pathway, translational, tractability, and competitive evidence.
    Skill Why use it
    Life Science Research Search scientific databases and literature to ground pathway, translational, tractability, and competitive evidence.

    Starter prompt

    Use the Life Science Research plugin to compare TSLP, IL33, and IL1RL1 for asthma target prioritization. Run these independent lanes in parallel with subagents: - Human genetics and GWAS: gwas-catalog-skill, opentargets-skill, gnomad-graphql-skill - Cohort replication and PheWAS: finngen-phewas-skill, ukb-topmed-phewas-skill, biobankjapan-phewas-skill, tpmi-phewas-skill - Target-disease evidence and disease context: opentargets-skill, efo-ontology-skill - Clinical and regulatory precedent: clinicaltrials-skill, opentargets-skill, chembl-skill, pharmgkb-skill - Literature and public-dataset context: ncbi-entrez-skill, ncbi-pmc-skill, biorxiv-skill, ncbi-datasets-skill, biostudies-arrayexpress-skill - Expression and tissue/cell-type context: human-protein-atlas-skill, gtex-eqtl-skill, cellxgene-skill, bgee-skill For each lane: - score TSLP, IL33, IL1RL1 on a 1-5 scale - keep direct asthma evidence separate from adjacent allergic/atopic phenotypes - save raw payloads when helpful Then synthesize: - a lane-by-target score table - a final rank of TSLP, IL33, IL1RL1 - a confidence assessment and the main caveats - two visuals: a prioritization heatmap and a GWAS summary figure with the lead asthma-linked variants for each target
    Use the Life Science Research plugin to compare TSLP, IL33, and IL1RL1 for asthma target prioritization. Run these independent lanes in parallel with subagents: - Human genetics and GWAS: gwas-catalog-skill, opentargets-skill, gnomad-graphql-skill - Cohort replication and PheWAS: finngen-phewas-skill, ukb-topmed-phewas-skill, biobankjapan-phewas-skill, tpmi-phewas-skill - Target-disease evidence and disease context: opentargets-skill, efo-ontology-skill - Clinical and regulatory precedent: clinicaltrials-skill, opentargets-skill, chembl-skill, pharmgkb-skill - Literature and public-dataset context: ncbi-entrez-skill, ncbi-pmc-skill, biorxiv-skill, ncbi-datasets-skill, biostudies-arrayexpress-skill - Expression and tissue/cell-type context: human-protein-atlas-skill, gtex-eqtl-skill, cellxgene-skill, bgee-skill For each lane: - score TSLP, IL33, IL1RL1 on a 1-5 scale - keep direct asthma evidence separate from adjacent allergic/atopic phenotypes - save raw payloads when helpful Then synthesize: - a lane-by-target score table - a final rank of TSLP, IL33, IL1RL1 - a confidence assessment and the main caveats - two visuals: a prioritization heatmap and a GWAS summary figure with the lead asthma-linked variants for each target

    Leverage skills

    The Life Science Research plugin includes skills for each evidence lane:

    • Human genetics and GWAS: gwas-catalog-skill, opentargets-skill, gnomad-graphql-skill
    • Cohort replication and PheWAS: finngen-phewas-skill, ukb-topmed-phewas-skill, biobankjapan-phewas-skill, tpmi-phewas-skill
    • Target-disease evidence and disease context: opentargets-skill, efo-ontology-skill
    • Clinical and regulatory precedent: clinicaltrials-skill, opentargets-skill, chembl-skill, pharmgkb-skill
    • Literature and public-dataset context: ncbi-entrez-skill, ncbi-pmc-skill, biorxiv-skill, ncbi-datasets-skill, biostudies-arrayexpress-skill
    • Expression and tissue/cell-type context: human-protein-atlas-skill, gtex-eqtl-skill, cellxgene-skill, bgee-skill

    Use these skills by mentioning them specifically, or let Codex decide when to use them.

    Step-by-step guide

    1. Start with a concrete comparison question and the exact targets, disease, and evidence lanes you want Codex to cover.
    2. Invoke the Life Science Research plugin and tell Codex to run the lanes in parallel with subagents so each evidence family stays bounded.
    3. Ask Codex to score each lane on a fixed 1-5 scale and to keep direct disease evidence separate from adjacent phenotypes.
    4. Review the saved raw payloads, the lane-by-target score table, and the synthesized rank in the same thread.

    Related use cases